Reschedule Cannabis

Here is a sick woman, who has now been evicted from her home because of her medicine.

SILVER CITY, N.M. (AP) - A handicapped woman says the manager of her apartment complex told her to move in three days after discovering the woman has marijuana for medical use.

Bobbie Wooten says she got an eviction notice Tuesday after a surprise inspection by a management representative for Silver Cliffs apartments who spotted her two marijuana plants.

A spokesman for the Arizona realty company that manages the complex says the eviction is within the terms of the lease, which calls for a drug-free environment.

Wooten, who uses a wheelchair, was paralyzed from the waist down in a car crash several years ago and suffers severe spasms.

She joined the state’s medical marijuana program when it went into effect last year.

State Health Department spokeswoman Deborah Busemeyer confirmed she’s in the program.

A “drug free” environment? I am willing to bet these apartments are filled with people on prescription narcotics, chain smoking cigarettes, and no doubt consuming alcohol. Prescription meds, alcohol, nicotine, are drugs and are found in many of the homes there. Why is this crealy burdened and sick woman being targeted because of her medical marijuana? She is part of the state approved medical marijuana program and this should be a lawyer’s dream case.

Sue. Sue Sue Sue.

Could someone be kicked out of her home because of her Vicodin prescription? No. Would the apartment complex and Sheriff be sued if they evicted and elderly woman for taking blood pressure medicine? yes, they would be.

I say this woman needs to find a good lawyer and stand up for her rights. She is part of the State medical marijuana program and laws need to be enacted to protect patients in this sort of situation.

New Mexico has a legal, state approved medical marijuana program. This sounds like the beginning of legislation, or a lawsuit.

The latest from California regarding medical marijuana.

According to the San Francisco Chronicle:

The state Supreme Court turned back a challenge to California’s medical marijuana law Thursday from two counties that said they were being forced to condone federal drug-law violations by state-approved pot users.

San Diego and San Bernardino county officials had sued to overturn Proposition 215, the 1996 initiative that legalized medical marijuana, and a more recent law that required them to issue identification cards to users who had a doctor’s recommendation.

The justices unanimously denied review of an appellate decision in July that concluded California was free to decide whether to punish drug users under its own laws, despite the federal ban on marijuana.

The decision is “a momentous victory for countless seriously ill patients,” said Adam Wolf, an American Civil Liberties Union lawyer who defended the state law in the appeals court. He said the counties should stop wasting money “in a doomed effort to undermine the will of California voters.”

But Thomas Bunton, a deputy San Diego County counsel, said the county would ask the U.S. Supreme Court to review the case.

The California law “authorizes people to engage in conduct that’s forbidden by federal law,” Bunton said.

Hurray for state’s rights. The people of California voted, and ultimately supported, compassionate use and safe access to medical marijuana. These people need to stop trying to go against the voters, and wasting tax payer’s money trying to change the state law allowing medical cannabis in California.

He said San Diego and San Bernardino counties particularly objected to the follow-up statute on identification cards that the Legislature passed in 2003. The cards, issued by the counties, protect their holders from arrest by state or local police for possessing small amounts of medical marijuana.

The U.S. Supreme Court has allowed federal authorities to rely on U.S. drug laws to prosecute medical marijuana patients and their suppliers, and to shut dispensaries in California and the 11 other states with laws similar to Prop. 215. But the court has not prevented the states from deciding which drugs to prohibit under their own laws.

In a separate case, the city of Garden Grove (Orange County) has asked the U.S. Supreme Court to overturn a California appellate ruling requiring police to return a patient’s medical marijuana after state charges were dismissed. That case also involves a potential conflict between federal and state law.

In the counties’ lawsuit, the Fourth District Court of Appeal in San Diego ruled July 31 that federal law doesn’t require states to impose criminal penalties for marijuana possession. The purpose of the federal law, the court said, is “to combat recreational drug use, not to regulate a state’s medical practices.”

Why are they wasting tax dollars on this?

In keeping up with the latest news on drug companies and their pain killers, here is the latest on Pfizer.

(Bloomberg) — Pfizer Inc. will pay $894 million to resolve most legal claims that its painkillers Celebrex and Bextra caused heart attacks and strokes.

Pfizer will pay $745 million to settle 90 percent of the suits claiming injuries from the products. The remainder will go to end class-action consumer fraud lawsuits and charges of inappropriate marketing by 33 states and the District of Columbia, New York-based Pfizer said today in a statement.

Pfizer, the world’s biggest drugmaker, was being sued over allegations that Celebrex and Bextra increased the risk of heart attacks or strokes after a similar pill, Merck & Co.’s Vioxx, was pulled from the market over the same side effects in 2004. Celebrex is still sold, generating $2.3 billion for Pfizer last year, while Bextra was recalled over a rare skin condition in 2005. Pfizer will book the settlement amount in its third-quarter earnings scheduled to be reported Oct. 21.

“Anytime that you have an opportunity to resolve litigation, which is inevitably something that creates uncertainty, in terms that make sense for the people and corporation, it is a good thing to do,” Amy Schulman, Pfizer’s general counsel, said in a telephone interview. “Given the stage we were at and events that have transpired, this seemed like an appropriate time to reach a resolution of the various matters.”

The reason this is important to medical marijuana patients or advocates, or caregiver, is that cannabis has often been used as a pain killer, and it does not have these types of side effects. One has every right to question the safety of these drug companies.

The article goes on to say…

Pfizer acquired Celebrex and Bextra as part of its more than $60 billion acquisition of Pharmacia Corp. in 2003. Bextra, Celebrex, and Vioxx are part of a class of medicines called non- steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, which also include ibuprofen and naproxen. U.S. regulators have warned that these drugs may increase the risk of heart attack and stroke.

Pfizer said there is no evidence that Celebrex, when taken at lower doses, poses a risk to the heart. Patients taking the biggest Celebrex dose of 400 milligrams twice a day tripled their chance of a heart attack or stroke, compared with people taking a placebo, according to a study presented in March at the American College of Cardiology meeting.

A more definitive assessment of Celebrex risks won’t come until 2010 or 2011, when a $100 million study of 20,000 patients comparing Celebrex with the pain pills ibuprofen and naproxen is expected to be completed by the Cleveland Clinic in Ohio.

Pfizer said the settlements include $60 million to 33 states and Washington, D.C., over alleged illegal promotion of Bextra and $89 million for consumer fraud lawsuits.

I hope people educate themselves on the safety of the “medicine” they are taking, to find out if it may affect their own health. When we see lawsuits like this being settled, one has to wonder, what is going on?

We need to start thinking more clearly on medical marijuana, and promoting the safe medicinal use of cannabis.

It looks like the fight continues in California. Garden Grove, famous from the Sublime song of the same name, has decided to ban medical marijuana dispensaries. Not too cool, man.

GARDEN GROVE, Calif.—Medical marijuana dispensaries won’t be allowed in the northern Orange County city of Garden Grove.

The City Council voted 4-1 Tuesday night to ban the pot stores. The ordinance takes effect in 30 days.

Councilman Mark Rosen cast the lone dissenting vote, saying the ban is “mired in mid-20th-century thinking.”

He noted the Unit-D dispensary, which has a conditional-use permit, has been operating for seven months without problems.

Councilman Steve Jones says he does not want the city to become exposed to liability for poor-quality pot.

California’s Compassionate Use Act permits marijuana use for medical reasons.

This goes against every reason why patients need safe access, not make it more difficult for people to acquire the much needed medicine. With gas prices the way they are, people need to be able to drive there or have someone drive them to local dispensaries. If you make people have to drive hundreds of miles to acquire their prescribed medicine, how will that help them?

California’s Compassionate Use Act allows patients access, it’s time to stop with these types of bans on dispensaries. The taxes paid by them benefits the city, and from what we’ve seen elsewhere in California, it does not encourage any more crime in the area. In fact, it cuts down the black market drug trade in the city, people with safe access, no longer have a need to buy drugs on the street. They can drive to the local medical marijuana dispensary and pick up their prescription like any patient. Help stop the drug deals on the street by fighting for your local medical marijuana dispensary.

Well, I don’t think any of us in America expected this housing foreclosure mess, and financial crisis that is upon us. Needlesstosay, we are putting off the move to California at this time, but I will surely post about it in the future. However, since the election is coming, I guess it is my duty to address the clear question about the two candidates who are running for the President of the United States in November. Which one supports medical marijuana? Which one wants to lock up people for smoking cannabis?

Clearly, I do not need to go into John McCain’s thoughts on the subject to make it known, he is against anything to do with ‘medical marijuana.” He does not believe it has medicinal qualities, nor does he support its decriminalization, nor the legalization, for that matter. This man supports throwing people in jail, for the crime of possession, or even smoking a marijuana joint. Really, we need to do away with this mentality and get to the real issues facing America.

Barack Obama, on the other hand. Has a clear, and long record, of supporting medical marijuana. He has also voted to stop the raids on medical marijuana patients. This is all good news, and should come into play, come election day, if you are a supporter of medical marijuana.

Barack, gets it! He understands, some patients, need safe access to marijuana, or cannabis, for medicinal use.

We encourage all voters to think for themselves, but if you support medical marijuana, the choice is abundantly clear. Vote Obama!

In the past Senator Barack Obama has promised to end the federal raids on state medical marijuana patients, as well as their caregivers. He has voted against amendments to undermine state laws regarding cannabis as medicine.

It’s time for this country to go green, and by green I don’t mean energy, although that’d be nice too. Let’s knock some sense into congress and finally get meaningful legislation regarding medicinal marijuana in the next four years!

On June 2, 2007 Obama said this about raids: “I don’t think that should be a top priority of us, raiding people who are using … medical marijuana. With all the things we’ve got to worry about, and our Justice Department should be doing, that probably shouldn’t be a high priority.”

While the economy is certainly on everyone’s mind, we need to vote in someone who fill move forward with a new plan regarding rescheduling cannabis and helping change marijuana laws in this country. Go Obama!